SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers are lastly sending to Gov. Gavin Newsom a sizzling potato of a invoice that may bar police from making arrests on a cost of loitering for prostitution, 9 months after the measure handed the Legislature, the creator of the invoice introduced Monday.
Democratic Sen. Scott Wiener and different supporters mentioned arrests for loitering with the intent to interact in prostitution usually depend on cops’ perceptions and disproportionately goal transgender, Black and Latino ladies.
Critics see it as an additional erosion of prison penalties that tie the palms of police on quality-of-life points like shoplifting and automotive burglaries. Greg Burt, a spokesman for the California Family Council, and different opponents concern it’s a part of an eventual effort to decriminalize prostitution.
“This bill seems to be perfect if you want sex trafficking to even increase in California,” he mentioned. “This bill is really going to affect poor neighborhoods — it’s not going to affect neighborhoods where these legislators live.”
People are additionally studying…
The invoice wouldn’t decriminalize soliciting or partaking in intercourse work. It would enable those that have been beforehand convicted or are at the moment serving loitering sentences to ask a court docket to dismiss and seal the report of the conviction.
The measure has handed each legislative chambers, however Wiener took the weird step of stopping the invoice from going to Newsom after the Assembly authorised the measure in September with no votes to spare. More than two dozen of his fellow Democrats within the Assembly and Senate both voted no or declined to vote.
He wished time, Wiener mentioned then, “to make the case about why this civil rights bill is good policy … and why this discriminatory loitering crime goes against California values.”
But in the nine months since lawmakers acted, concerns about crime, homelessness and the perception that major California cities are becoming more unsafe have become more acute, providing fodder for political campaigns heading into the November election.
Among the bill’s supporters is San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, who voters just recalled from office in mid-term after critics mounted a campaign labeling him as soft on criminals.
Newsom, a Democrat running for reelection after easily beating back a recall last year, has said more needs to be done to address homelessness and shoplifting. Newsom’s spokespeople did not immediately comment on Wiener’s bill.
Burt believes lawmakers waited to send it to Newsom until after the governor defeated the recall and safely made it through the June 7 primary election.
The bill is sponsored in part by groups supporting gay and transgender rights, and Wiener said he waited to send the measure to Newsom until Pride Month, which celebrates the LGTBQ community.
“It is more important than ever to get rid of a law that targets our community,” mentioned Wiener, who’s homosexual. “Pride isn’t just about rainbow flags and parades. It’s about protecting the most marginalized in our community.”
The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the nation’s largest such agency, and the 75,000-member Peace Officers Research Association of California are among the opponents. Both say repealing it will hinder the prosecution of those who commit crimes related to prostitution and human trafficking and make it harder to identify and assist those being victimized.
In a statement to lawmakers, the sheriff’s department said the law is “often used to keep prostitutes from hanging around public places, business and residential communities, which can breed crime and drug use.”
While the intent is good, the unintended consequences will be to benefit sex buyers, the department said.
But Wiener said the loitering law “essentially allows law enforcement to target and arrest people if they are wearing tight clothes or a lot of makeup.” Similar legislation became law in New York last year, and Wiener cast his bill as part of a larger movement to end discrimination against and violence toward sex workers.
The debate split sex workers and advocates, with the American Civil Liberties Union of California supporting it and the nonpartisan National Center on Sexual Exploitation opposing it.
Once it formally reaches his desk, Newsom will have 12 days to sign or veto the measure.
Two other related measures already are law.
A bill passed in 2016 bars arresting minors for prostitution, with the intent that they instead be treated as victims. A 2019 bill bars arresting sex workers if they are reporting various crimes as a victim or witness. The same law bans using possession of condoms as reason for an arrest.
Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This materials is probably not printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.