Edinburgh crime: Lukasz Czapla homicide trial hears he killed son Julius to “get back” at and “hurt” tot’s mum

Let us know what you suppose and be a part of the dialog on the backside of this text.

Prosecutor Alan Cameron advised jurors on Tuesday that Lukasz Czapla,41, killed two-year-old Julius to “get back” at and “hurt” his former accomplice Patrycja Szczesniak after discovering she had began a brand new relationship.

Sign up to our day by day publication

He was making submissions within the trial of Czapla, of Muirhouse, Edinburgh, who has admitted to being accountable for the culpable murder of Julius however denies murdering the kid.

Tragic: Little Julius Czapla

The High Court in Edinburgh heard Czapla despatched a collection of textual content messages to Patrycja on the evening Julius died at a home within the metropolis in November 2020.

The jury heard that within the messages, Czapla requested Patrycja about her new accomplice and her intercourse life. But she didn’t reply the questions.

In his closing speech to jurors, Mr Cameron spoke of proof given by Czapla earlier in his trial by which he mentioned he determined to kill Julius for altruistic causes.

Czapla’s attorneys declare that this and different proof reveals that the accused didn’t homicide Julius however was in reality accountable for his culpable murder – as he was allegedly of diminished accountability on the time.

However, Mr Cameron mentioned the proof earlier than the jury confirmed a special purpose for why Czapla killed Julius and that he was motivated by anger and jealousy.

Urging jurors to convict Czapla of homicide, Mr Cameron made reference to proof given to court docket by advisor forensic psychiatrist Dr Alex Quinn who mentioned he believed that Czapla’s actions have been a “narcissistic and entitled” act.

Read More

Read More

Julius Czapla homicide trial: Father admits mendacity when he mentioned he couldn’t rememb…

He additionally made reference to proof given to court docket by Czapla’s pal Wojciech Marchlewski, 41, and to proof given by advisor psychiatrist Deborah Mountain.

Mr Cameron mentioned: “The accused sent four separate messages during the course of 10 minutes in which he asked her about her sex life and with reference to a graphic sexual act.

“Again, I suggest that what really set him off that night, what p***ed him off, what infuriated him to use his own language was her refusal to answer questions about her new partner and their sex life – not about her son at all.

“All these factors, I suggest point away from the altruistic motive and towards the alternative put forward by Dr Quinn – that of revenge and jealousy.

“You will remember Dr Mountain’s evidence that the accused seemed more distressed when speaking about his own future.

“Against a background of obsession about his ex-partner’s supposed infidelity and made furious by her mention of a new partner and refusal to discuss him or her sex life with him, the accused voluntarily consumed alcohol and drugs.

“In that condition his impulse control was lowered and he acted upon his emotions and anger and jealousy and killed his son as a way to get back at her, to surprise her as he described it to Mr Marchlewski.

“He was motivated not by some misplaced altruism but rather than jealously and anger towards his ex partner.

“He was furious with his ex partner who had told him about her new partner and refused to answer his sexual questions.

“He took pills and a significant amount of alcohol which removed the control that he had over his impulses and in a fit of anger and spite killed his son to get back at and hurt his former partner.

“That he may deeply regret it now is of no moment. All that matters is that he did it.”

In his closing speech to the jury, Mr Cameron made reference to Czapla’s proof that he was involved about Patrycja mistreating Julius following the couple’s cut up in June 2020.

He mentioned the jury heard proof which confirmed that Czapla had complimented his former accomplice’s parenting abilities.

Mr Cameron additionally advised the jury that they might conclude that the accused’s claims of diminished accountability have been a “tactical ploy” to minimise his punishment.

He added: “I suggest there is a significant body of evidence to suggest that they had been heavily exaggerated by him if not completely made up to give some support to his claims of diminished responsibility.

“I suggest that you might conclude that he had few if any genuinely held concerns at the time he killed Julius and his increasing emphasis on this as time has gone on is nothing more than a tactical ploy to minimise his punishment.”

He additionally urged jurors to think about Dr Quinn’s evaluation of Czapla of their deliberations.

Mr Cameron added: “Dr Quinn said there was evidence to support an alternative scenario that the killing of his son was a narcissistic and entitled act and that the predisposing factors was that his failed relationship, his obessionality with regards to his ex-partner’s sexual activity and a wish to retaliate with the hurt which she has caused him – he wanted to surprise her in the words he used in his conversation with Mr March in the weeks prior to the killing.

“That is what I suggest the evidence in this case demonstrates is the true motivation of his actions – Dr Quinn said he used the word ‘narcissistic’ meaning that the accused’s thinking and explanations all returned to him.

“You may think that the evidence reflects in all sorts of ways a self centred world view on the part of the accused.

“Dr Quinn said that during his interviews with him in December 2020 he seemed convinced of the supposed infidelities of his former partner in a manner which was poorly evidenced and paranoid.

“He said the accused had appeared fixated on Patrycja’s sexual behaviours and repeatedly returned to the subject of her sexual appetite and a specific sexual act which he said she had wanted to engage in and that he did not.

“Dr Quinn said this appeared incongruous during conversations centred around the death of his son and his role in that.”

Defence solicitor advocate Iain McSporran QC urged jurors to convict his shopper on the culpable murder cost.

He mentioned he didn’t search the jury’s “sympathy” for his shopper. Speaking about Patrycja, Mr McSporran added: “How can Earth can she ever hope to recover from the loss which she has suffered in the circumstances?”

But he added that the proof within the case confirmed that Czapla was responsible of culpable murder.

He added: “You should return a verdict of guilty and a verdict of culpable homicide even if it goes against the grain. Even if sticks in your throat. Even if you do so with regret and reluctance.

“You should return that verdict because by doing that you have complied with the oath or the affirmation you made at the outset to return a true verdict according to the evidence.”

Czapla is accused of murdering his son at his home in Muirhouse, Edinburgh, on November 20 or 21 2020 by assaulting him and repeatedly placing him on the physique with a skewer, repeatedly discharging an air pistol at him and repeatedly capturing him within the head and inserting a pillow on his face and asphyxiating the kid.

He pleaded responsible to culpable murder – however prosecutors rejected the plea at first of proceedings.

Crown attorneys have accepted responsible pleas to motoring and medicines offences.

The trial, earlier than decide Lord Beckett continues on Wednesday.

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.