Scottish and UK governments are on a collision course over nuclear vitality and oil – Dr Richard Dixon

Construction work continues on the over-budget and delayed Hinkley Point C nuclear energy station website (Picture: Finnbarr Webster/Getty Images)

In early March, Boris Johnson stated he would produce, as a matter of urgency, a plan to answer the dual challenges of warfare in Ukraine and the cost-of-living disaster.

Four weeks later, we lastly have the British Energy Security Strategy and it does just about the alternative of what’s wanted. Supposedly it is because the PM and Chancellor couldn’t agree on key measures.

Sign up to our Opinion publication

Sign up to our Opinion publication

The result’s a method that convinces no-one. Even the right-wing press have roundly lambasted it.

The very first thing you might be taught in any class about vitality is that utilizing much less is a lot better than producing it in another way. Yet, there’s nothing in any respect within the technique on the quickest, most cost-effective and most blatant approach to save vitality and cut back payments – bettering the vitality effectivity of individuals’s houses.

The last item you’ll do if you wish to change our vitality system shortly and at an reasonably priced price is put money into new nuclear reactors, but that’s precisely what the federal government plans to do, egged on by Labour’s new enthusiasm.

The cowl of the technique reveals the development website at Hinkley Point C, initially proposed within the mid-Eighties, topic of a two-and-a-half 12 months public inquiry and with development now operating ten years late and lots of occasions over price range. The world’s costliest energy plant is probably not the cleverest instance to make use of.

Read More

Read More

Scotland ‘dangers paying the value’ of SNP’s opposition to nuclear, warns Labour

The plan suggests eight new nuclear reactors. In 2010, the Conservative-Lib Dem coalition authorities deliberate to construct eight new reactors within the subsequent decade … 12 years later the 2 reactors at Hinkley are the one ones really beneath development they usually may presumably producing electrical energy in 2027 with a price ticket of £23 billion.

There will probably be a brand new spherical of purposes for oil and gasoline manufacturing within the autumn, given a inexperienced gloss by the entire con that’s the Climate Compatibility Checklist. The Cambo oilfield is likely to be again on the desk.

The authorities says it’s reviewing the science on fracking, and Ineos has already kindly supplied to start out drilling.

The technique does give some welcome backing to offshore wind however stress from Tory backbenchers has meant there’s solely a session on planning for onshore wind, the quickest and most cost-effective approach to make new inexperienced electrical energy.

The technique doubles the earlier dedication to producing hydrogen however maybe half of that is to return from the smart renewable electrical energy route, the remainder from oil, gasoline and nuclear.

The Scottish Government is because of publish a set of vitality situations earlier than the summer time and a draft Energy Strategy within the autumn. There will probably be loads of vitality effectivity and renewables however no new nuclear and no fracking.

When pressed by the Tories just lately, the First Minister stated that opening new oil and gasoline fields was not the reply to the present disaster. Who would have thought just a few years in the past that the First Minister of Scotland can be saying no to new oil and gasoline?

Apart from offshore wind, the UK and Scottish plans on vitality are just about the alternative of one another. Sparks will fly.

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for studying this text. We’re extra reliant in your assist than ever because the shift in client habits led to by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you have not already, please contemplate supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.